Elpis

Open-source Rust environment for AI coding agents with context management, pruning, memory, retrieval, session continuity, and provider-neutral model access.

Elpis website

Never lose a thread again.

You run an agent inside Elpis, and it becomes Elpis.

Elpis is an open-source fork of OpenAI's Codex CLI that keeps the proven execution foundation while adding explicit context control, durable continuity, auditable pruning, and provider-neutral ownership around the model loop.

Linux verification License Telemetry

Install • Features • Evaluation • Docs

Contents

Quickstart

What is Elpis

Why Elpis

Core Features

Context engineering

Context Ledger and observability

Sessions and continuity

Memory

Deterministic work graphs

Bring your own provider

Integrations and tools

Privacy and ownership

Evaluation status

RQ1: Context Reduction & Operating Hygiene

RQ2 & RQ3: Target Retention & Task Quality

RQ4: Pruning Overhead & Token Economics

RQ5: Forensic Auditability

Documentation

License

Quickstart

Linux x8664 and macOS on Apple Silicon:

The installer picks the right binary for your machine and installs RTK, which powers shell-output filtering. On first launch, choose a provider and sign in or enter its API key.

v0.1.2 is the current release.

What is Elpis

Elpis is a provider-neutral coding-agent environment. The selected model or runtime performs inference; Elpis owns the surrounding working state: context admission, continuity, memory, permissions, tools, evidence, and the terminal interface.

It starts from OpenAI's Apache-2.0 Codex CLI and preserves its execution foundation — terminal UI, patches, permissions, sandboxing, sessions, and tool lifecycle — while adding a continuity- first control layer around it. Change the provider without throwing away the project context. Nothing about the project has to be explained twice.

Different paths. Same roots. One shared project.

Why Elpis

Long sessions fill up with transcripts, file reads, searches, command output, and dead ends. The useful state gets buried in the story of how the agent reached it, while every request pays for more context.

Elpis separates the active working set from durable evidence. The next request receives a small, inspectable context; the exact record stays on disk and can be retrieved when it is needed.

Three paired configured historical runs with automatic pruning enabled under the superseded high-frequency setup used one byte-identical prompt, the same model, and the same source commit on both arms. In those runs, peak context per request fell 47–65%; median context stabilized at 26.6–27.1%. Codex peaked above 90% of the window in each run, while Elpis stayed safely bounded in the green zone.

Elpis never modifies a model's own output or a request already in flight. Pruning rewrites only harness-supplied tool output, using a separate model instance sequenced against the main agent.

Core Features

Context engineering

Context is a budgeted working set, not a dumped transcript. Elpis makes admission visible and uses a layered pipeline to keep useful findings while removing disposable exploration:

Layer What it does When 1. RTK shell-output filtering Compacts supported command output before it reaches the model. Before the agent sees it 2. Deterministic safety cap Bounds exceptionally large tool results. This is inherited from Codex. Before the agent sees it 3. Ace pruning — Experimental Selectively rewrites eligible old tool evidence toward a safe working-set target, preserving the latest context and an evidence pointer. Manual /prune or /force-prune; automatic pressure cycling only in a conversation started with the default-off setting enabled

/prune and /force-prune are explicit manual Ace actions and do not rewrite user instructions, assistant messages, or model reasoning. /compact immediately runs Codex native compaction; it is independent of Ace pruning. Automatic native compaction uses the model-window threshold and usable-window headroom. Automatic Ace pruning is Experimental and off by default; /settings saves its value for the next conversation.

What a pruning decision looks like

One real pass from disk. A search command whose raw output ran to 18,930 characters — close to 5,000 tokens carried across requests:

Before — what the model was carrying:

After — what the model carries on the next request:

Context Ledger and observability

The Context Ledger (Tab; during an active turn, Alt+C always toggles it) lists admitted goals, rules, memory, and other portable sources with their byte sizes and capped character-derived estimates. Toggling a row writes admission.toml, which controls what the next turn receives.

Development rules are ordinary Markdown Ledger rows, not skills: newly discovered rules start included and an explicit exclusion persists. A nonempty configured development-rule root list replaces the managed fallback; an empty list uses it. Elpis leaves ordinary and bundled skills off by product default, while deliberate user configuration can enable a selected skill. Enabled skills expose compact metadata and keep their bodies lazy; /skills shows available candidates and their origins, but mentions and the model-visible list contain enabled skills only. The Ledger has no skills-catalog token row; its per-source estimates are not tokenizer measurements.

/context answers a different question: where the window went. It displays token usage by user messages, agent responses, tool calls, system prompt, Development rules, and free space, alongside available backtrack checkpoints.

Sessions and continuity

Keep the working context across model switches, compaction, and restarts:

GOAL.md holds the current task. It is carried into each request, stays visible across

compaction, and is editable during a run.

ES.md is an event-derived executive summary. It records modified files, commands run,

blockers, and next steps, and is updated as the run progresses.

Exact resume continues an existing thread with its full history, using the provider-native

session when one is available.

Lean continuation starts a clean thread from the current GOAL.md, ES.md, and active

rules. This sheds old exploration without losing the objective.

Memory

Durable memory is one Markdown file, MEMORY.md, in the Elpis memory directory (derived from CODEXHOME). The Context Ledger discovers it and lists it as a row, switched off until you admit it: like every optional row, memory does not reach the model unasked.

One visible file. Plain text. Read it, edit it, commit it to git, or delete it.

Admitted in the open. Because it is a Ledger row, you can always see whether memory

reached the model, switch it on when you want it, and drop it when you do not.

Retrieval beyond that file is your choice. Register an MCP server — for example

rag-mcp-lancedb — and Elpis will use it.

Elpis previously ran an extraction, consolidation, and promotion pipeline. It was removed because it did not work: across two threshold settings it produced zero durable promotions, every sweep landing one recall short of the gate. Memory that rewrites itself in the background without appearing anywhere is the failure mode the Ledger row exists to prevent.

Deterministic work graphs

A coordinator can fan work out to several agents under an engine that validates the plan before anything runs. This is Elpis's own; it is not part of the Codex foundation.

The coordinator submits a complete task graph — tasks, dependencies, write scopes, acceptance criteria, and environments. Elpis then owns the scheduling:

Cycles cannot be scheduled. Kahn's topological algorithm proves the graph is acyclic

and rejects it otherwise, so no worker is created for a plan that could only deadlock.

Write conflicts are caught by construction. Path-prefix intersection detects

overlapping write scopes, and all writable tasks in one environment are serialized even when their declared prefixes do not overlap.

Verification is not optional. A writable task without a directly dependent verify

task in the same environment is rejected before dispatch.

Evidence gates progress. Dependent work is released only after an accepted result;

a failed, cancelled, or blocked prerequisite blocks its descendants.

Elpis never creates, merges, rebases, deletes, or pushes branches or worktrees. Preparing and integrating them stays coordinator-owned, because those operations change durable user state and deserve deliberate review.

Off by default. Enable with enablefanout = true under [features]; there is no slash command. Full rules and the graph schema are in docs/WORKGRAPHS.md.

Bring your own provider

Elpis is not tied to a single model vendor:

OpenAI: GPT-4o, GPT-5.6-Luna, o1, o3, and compatible endpoints.

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash, Gemini 1.5 Pro.

Local & self-hosted: Ollama, vLLM, and any OpenAI-compatible server.

Switch models mid-session without restarting. The working context, goal, and session memory are preserved across provider boundaries.

Integrations and tools

Extend Elpis with external capabilities that stay in their own processes through MCP:

Workspace retrieval: rag-mcp-lancedb provides local LanceDB/Tantivy search over your documents.

Voice transcription: WhisperType provides local speech-to-text without adding its model/runtime dependencies to Elpis core.

Privacy and ownership

Telemetry is off by default and no analytics are uploaded unless you explicitly configure an exporter. Bring your own provider keys. Durable Elpis state is local files and SQLite that you can inspect, edit, export, or delete.

Evaluation status

The published evaluation reports three paired, byte-identical configured historical workloads with automatic pruning enabled under the superseded high-frequency setup, on gpt-5.6-luna (258,400 token context window).

RQ1: Context Reduction & Operating Hygiene

Across those configured historical runs, Elpis maintained working sets within safe operational thresholds.

Peak Context Utilization

In those configured historical runs, Codex expanded into the critical danger zone (>90% window) in every run, forcing 3 emergency compactions. Elpis maintained peak window utilization at 32.5–49.5%, achieving a 47–65% reduction in peak context footprint:

Input Token Distribution & Interquartile Stability

In those configured historical runs, Codex suffered wide distribution variance as transcripts accumulated, while Elpis tightly stabilized median token input at 68.8k–69.6k tokens (26.6%–27.0% of the window):

Trajectory Dynamics across Context Health Bands

When normalized across the request lifecycle (0% to 100% completion), Codex exhibits unbounded monotonic growth until emergency rollover occurs. The Elpis trace shown here is a configured historical run with automatic pruning enabled under the superseded high-frequency setup; it is not current default behavior:

Operating Zone Breakdown

Across those configured historical requests, Elpis spent over 95% of its operating lifespan inside the safe and healthy bands, with zero requests entering the critical danger zone:

RQ2 & RQ3: Target Retention & Task Quality

RQ2 (Information Retention): In benchmark audits testing recall of key file paths, schemas, and error signatures after pruning, 100% of tested targets (6/6) were retained intact in active context.

RQ3 (Task Performance): Not established. The executed runs are incomplete and unreplicated, so they do not support a comparative correctness claim in either direction. No per-arm score is reported, and there is no evidence that pruning improves task completion or output quality.

RQ4: Pruning Overhead & Token Economics

Pruning adds an auxiliary model call sequenced against the main agent, and rewriting history invalidates the provider's cached prefix. Both costs are real. The figures below are configured historical runs with automatic pruning enabled under the superseded high-frequency setup; they bound that configuration's penalty rather than describe the current default: 730,810 auxiliary tokens spent to reclaim 605,377 context tokens (0.83 reclaimed per spent token).

RQ5: Forensic Auditability

Every pruning event produces an immutable audit record on disk under /.elpis/logs/pruning/. In full forensic reconstruction evaluations, 7 of 9 properties were completely recoverable from disk, 2 partial, and 0 absent.

Research Question Empirical Finding RQ1 — Context Efficiency Historical superseded high-frequency setup: peak reduction of 47–65%; median context stabilized at 26.6–27.1% of the 258k window. RQ2 — Information Retention 6/6 tested post-prune targets preserved intact (100% retention). RQ3 — Task Performance Not established. The available runs do not support a comparative correctness claim. RQ4 — Pruning Economics Penalty established, current magnitude open. The measured figures describe a superseded high-frequency configuration. RQ5 — Forensic Auditability 7/9 properties fully recoverable from local rollout evidence; 0 lost records.

Documentation

Context and pruning — admission, lifetimes, pressure pruning, and audit records

Sessions and continuity — exact resume, lean continuation, GOAL.md, and ES.md

Deterministic work graphs — plan validation, write scopes, concurrency, and evidence gates

Providers — provider adapters, BYOK, and protocol limitations

Evals & benchmarks — source data, procedures, scorers, and results

Technical guide — product thesis, requirements, and architecture

Research paper — technical preprint and formal specifications

License

Apache-2.0.

The execution foundation — terminal UI, patches, permissions, sandboxing, and sessions — derives from OpenAI's Apache-2.0 Codex CLI. Elpis extends that foundation with context admission and pruning, continuity checkpoints, auditable evidence, and provider control. Codex-derived source retains its upstream notices under codex-rs/.